![]() Higher for maximal compared to volitional tempo (1.24 m/s vs 0.90 m/s, respectively), and mean bar velocity Longer for volitional compared to maximal tempo (0.84 vs 0.67 s, respectively), peak bar velocity was significantly The post hoc analysis for main effect of tempo revealed that time under tension was significantly There was also a statistically significant main effect of movement tempo for time under tension (p < 0.001), peak bar velocity (p < 0.001) and for mean bar velocity (p < 0.001). The three-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant multi-interaction effect for time under tension (p < 0.001), peak bar velocity (p = 0.04) and for mean bar velocity (p < 0.001). In a randomized order, the participants performed six sets of the barbell squat and the bench press exercise at progressive loads from 40% to 90%1RM (step by 10%) under two testing conditions: with volitional movement tempo or with maximal movement tempo. Ten healthy men volunteered for the study (age = 26.4 ± 4.8 years body mass = 93.8 ± 9.6 kg barbell squat one-repetition maximum (1RM) = 175 ± 16.7 kg bench press 1RM = 140.5 ± 26.8 kg). The goal of the study was to determine the differences between volitional and maximal movement tempo during resistance exercise. Conclusion: Consequently, it can be claimed that the optimal load value for maximal power output in exercises include shows dissimilarity according to different sports, and individuals need to perform their training by using the load value capable of maximizing their power output. Results: The results showed there was a statistically significant difference according to different sports in terms of maximal power value and optimal training load for the MPP parameter in both SJLoad and BT exercises. One-way analysis of variance, test of significance between two means, and correlation analysis were used in the study. To determine the mean propulsive power (MPP), the participants executed bench throw (BT) and loaded-squat jump (SJLoad) exercises using an external load corresponding to 30% and 40% of their body weight respectively for the upper body the lower body (10% increments until reaching the maximal power value) via an isoinertial velocity transducer ( T-Force dynamic measurement system). To determine the lower and upper body strength characteristics, bench press (BP) and full squat (SQFull) exercises were performed in the research. Methods: To achieve this, a total of sixty athletes from different sports (football, handball, arm-wrestling, volleyball, wrestling, and martial arts) volunteered for the study. Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare optimal training load which maximizes power output in both lower and upper body exercises for athletes competing in different sports. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |